Mistakes 1–3: timing
The deadlines are short and the clocks are unforgiving:
- 1. Recording late. Each recordable case belongs on the Form 300 within 7 calendar days of the employer learning about it. Cases batched quarterly, or reconstructed each January, are individually citable — and the gaps show.
- 2. Missing the severe-injury report clock. A fatality must be reported to OSHA within 8 hours, an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or eye loss within 24. Recording a case on the log does not discharge the reporting duty — they are independent obligations.
- 3. Letting the log go stale during retention. Records are kept five years, and the Form 300 must be updated during that window as cases evolve — outcome reclassifications and day-count changes included.
Mistakes 4–6: classification
Where the judgment calls go wrong:
- 4. Calling medical treatment "first aid." The first-aid list in 1904.7(b)(5)(ii) is exclusive. Prescription medication, sutures, physical therapy — all medical treatment, all recordable, no matter how minor the injury looks or who provided the care.
- 5. Conflating recordability with compensability. The workers' comp claim decision and the OSHA recording decision use different criteria and different deciders. Waiting for a claim determination to record a case is how 7-day deadlines die.
- 6. Stopping the day counts. Days away and restricted-duty days keep accruing until the employee returns or the count hits the 180-day cap. Counts frozen at the first estimate understate severity and mismatch the medical file.
Mistakes 7–8: privacy and paperwork
The details inspectors check line by line:
- 7. Ignoring privacy cases. For privacy-concern cases (intimate-body-part injuries, sexual assault, mental illness, needlesticks, and similar), the name stays off the log — "privacy case" goes in the name column and the identity lives on a separate confidential list.
- 8. The wrong 300A signature. Certification belongs to a company executive who examined the log. A safety coordinator's signature, however diligent, does not satisfy 1904.32.
Mistakes 9–10: scope
Where multi-site employers slip:
- 9. One log for the whole company. Records are establishment-level. Each covered location keeps its own 300 and posts its own 300A; mobile and short-lived sites roll up to a supervising establishment by rule, not by convenience.
- 10. Skipping the March 2 electronic submission. Establishments covered by 1904.41 must also submit data through the Injury Tracking Application — a paper-perfect log with no ITA submission is still a violation for covered establishments.
The pattern behind all ten
Every one of these is a process failure, not a knowledge failure: facts trapped in inboxes, decisions made ad hoc, artifacts maintained annually instead of continuously. The durable fix is a single incident record feeding the log, the incident report, and the summary — with the recordability decision made once, on time, by someone accountable, and the evidence trail kept.
Frequently asked questions
Make all ten structurally impossible
One incident record, a walked recordability decision with a human in charge, live day counts, privacy-case handling, and per-establishment artifacts — maintained continuously, not each January.